RSS Twitter Facebook YouTube
Expand Menu

Is there a closer at the Corner of Carnegie and Ontario?

What will the Indians do at closer?

Is there a closer at the Corner of Carnegie and Ontario?
December 1, 2013
Share via: Share: Facebook Share: Twitter Share: Google Share: Pinterest Share: Print Share: Email

I normally don't find myself roaming the Corner of Carnegie and Ontario on Sunday morning, and truth be told, didn't expect it as my morning began. What started as a short and succinct IBI power poll recapping last week's question regarding the Indians' closer, turned into a massive look at some other major league teams and their closer tendencies with regards to cost-effectiveness and success.

Now, I'm no sabre-metrics guy, and I never will be, so I tried to stay away from that in this piece, instead focusing on cost-effective strategies that certain clubs used over the years, including the Indians.

This was an off-the-cuff undertaking, and as you'll see as you meander your way through my piece, I only scratched the surface of what this could have turned into.

Let's face it, after a 12-hour college football endurance test yesterday, I didn't expect to be sitting in front of my laptop this long today...but as Alabama found out, things don't always end as you expect them.

Let's take a look at the Indians quest for a closer...

In our last Power Poll, I took a look at which current member of the Indians would be the Indians closer in 2014, or if you thought that candidate would come from outside the organization. The closer’s role is always a major point of contention for baseball fans in general, and Cleveland Indians’ fans in particular.

Since the Jose Mesa era in Cleveland, one of the hottest topics of conversation from year-to-year has been not only who should close games for the Cleveland Indians, but whether or not the Indians should have a ‘closer-by-committee’ to help enhance match-ups and utilize the best relievers for high-leverage situations.

There are many strategies employed by successful teams in this regard.

I’m going to focus my spotlight on three teams, the Tampa Bay Rays, the St. Louis Cardinals and the Oakland A’s. This isn’t really a scientific look, or even a metrics look, but only a focus on three teams who have had success with closers in different ways, but utilizing the same basic principles, and for the most part, have been cost-effective

The Rays have had a tendency to utilize older relievers in the role, while saving their young relievers for those previously mentioned higher leverage situations during the game. In 2007, their last losing season, 36-year-oldAlberto Reyes was their primary closer. In 2008, the Rays signed 38-year old Troy Percival to be their primary closer during much of the season, but only had one save after August 13th, giving way to 30-year old Dan Wheeler.

By the end of 2008, six players had saved two games or more, showing Madden’s ability to utilize players in match-up situations. In 2009, youngster J.P. Howell led the team with 17 saves, but this time, nine players had at least one save. In 2010, the Rays traded for 30-year old Rafael Soriano for a one year run as the primary closer. He was granted free agency after his 45 save season. In 2011, 35-year-old Kyle Farnsworth found his way to the closer role for the Rays, saving 25 games, the most by far in his career. In 2012, the Rays signed castaway Fernando Rodney, who has been the Rays primary closer for the past two seasons at sub-$3 million dollar contracts.

Was the Rays scenario always perfect?

No, but they were able to balance the closer role utilizing cost efficiency with decent options, while allowing their more stable youngsters work during more high leverage situations throughout the game. Joe Maddon was never afraid to use any of these young relievers in a closer situation if the situation presented itself.

This is a strategy perfected by former A’s and Cardinals manager Tony LaRussa, who famously moved Dennis Eckersley to the closer role in 1987, and watched him become one of the most prolific closers of all-time. Eckersley would join LaRussa in St. Louis, and LaRussa would use a similar strategy over the years of finding older guys trying to rebound. In 1998, a transition year, Juan Acevedo and Jeff Brantley shared the role. In 1999, they dealt forRicky Bottalico, who was coming off a bad year in Philadelphia. In 2000, they received the 33-year old Dave Veresin a trade with the Colorado Rockies, and in 2001, Veres saved the most games, but LaRussa moved to a committee thanks to injuries and occasionally match-ups.

In 2002, LaRussa turned to Jason Isringhausen, a former starter that was moved to closer in previous season. He would be the Cardinals primary closer until 2007, and at quite a cost. In 2008, LaRussa transitioned from Isringhausen to the 35-year old Ryan Franklin through 2010, before giving way to youngster Fernando Salas, who was really just a transition to 30-year old Jason Motte. Of course, Edward Mujica was signed to become their closer last season after elbow surgery to Motte.

The Cardinals are infamous for utilizing their young stud starters as high leverage relievers while they are earning their stripes to start. Guys like Adam Wainwright and Lance Lynn made this progression, as well as several others.

Then there are the A’s. In 2002, they traded for Toronto closer Billy Koch, a proven guy that came with a decent, sub-$3 million dollar price tag. They traded him to Chicago and received Keith Foulke in that deal for one year, at $6 million. In 2004, they started with Arthur Rhodes, but traded for Octavio Dotel in the three-team deal that movedCarlos Beltran to Houston.

In 2005, the A’s began moving away from high-priced closers when the moved rookie Huston Street into the role as the season progressed. He was outstanding for two seasons making league minimum, but injuries would hamper him in 2007 and 2008.

In 2007, the A’s turned to old Tribe farmhand Alan Embree. He wasn’t great, but he was a veteran that held down the job. Street returned in 2008, and was lights out, but began struggling in the summer and eventually lost the job to a 28-year old rookie named Brad Ziegler.

In 2009, they turned to another rookie, 25-year old Andrew Bailey, who was their primary closer from 2009-2011, and fairly effective, again at league minimum. In typical A’s fashion, rather than pay him arbitration money, they dealt him for Josh Reddick from the Red Sox, and moved on to Grant Balfour, who they were already on tap to the tune of $4 million a year.

Again, you can see that the A’s moved from high-price veterans, to league minimum youngsters, to Grant Balfour, who was a relative cost-effective two-year, $8 million dollar signing in 2011, with a club option for a third year. There was some gamble there, but many thought he’d make in the $10 million dollar range, so they grabbed a bit of a bargain, then dealt Bailey so avoid having two guys at that salary.

Many of the players listed were very cost effective, with the exceptions being Eckersley (at the time), Soriano and Isringhsausen, as well as those early guys with the A’s, who moved from a veteran closer to league minimum type guy as Billby Beane began solidifying his Moneyball strategy.

The rest tended to be low-cost guys trying to earn their keep either after successful previous years as a starter or a non-closer.

What do you think the Indians will do?

Their history is interesting.

In 2000, they received Wickman as part of the trade that sent Richie Sexson to Milwaukee. He immediately became the Indians closer until he missed the 2003 season. He would continue to be the Indians closer for the most part until he was traded to the Atlanta Braves in 2006. His salary varied from $2 ½ million to $6 million, so his cost effectiveness varies from year to year, as he took a $3 million paycut from 2004-to-2005, after he missed 2003, and only pitched in part of 2004, two years in which the Indians were stuck with his $6 million payroll hit.

The year Wickman was dealt, they didn’t really have an option available to take his place, utilizing Rafael Betancourt, Fausto Carmona and finally settling on Tom Mastny, who was successful for a decent stretch, before imploding.

Enter the Joe Borowski experiment. He signed with the Indians for two-years, at $8 million overall, and while his ERA was bad, in 2007 he was the epitome of an old starter with young guns supporting him. He saved 45 games, and the Indians made the playoffs. He wasn’t the best reliever, but he accentuated Dos Rafael (Betancourt andRafael Perez) and the rest of the pen, as Bob Wickman had done in 2005.

In 2008, with fans clamoring for a trade or signing, the Indians did nothing, entering the year with Borowski again. He was injured to start the year off in 2008, and eventually went on the DL after blowing a couple of saves. Rafael Betancourt took over for a month, before Borowski returned in late May and reclaimed his role. He would slowly be eased out of it as the season progressed, and he was finally released after giving up a game-winning homer on July 1st.

Jensen Lewis would finish the year as the closer.

The Indians decided to spend to get a closer, and they signed Kerry Wood to a two-year, $20 million deal in 2009. He saved 20 games in a dreadful year for the Indians, then gave way to Chris Perez in 2010, before he was dealt to the Yankees.

Perez has been the closer for both Antonetti’s and Francona’s tenure, and his cost-effectiveness disappeared after his first full season as closer.

Enter 2014.

The top option in this week’s power poll was in-house option Cody Allen with 30% of the vote.  Allen, who doesn’t fit the mold of the Rays and the Cardinals, is a stud reliever that has never been utilized as a closer, but is likely the best reliever currently on the roster. He really is a lightning rod of discussion, as several folks either feel that he can’t handle the job because of his lack of experience, or because he should be utilized at other points of the game, like the Cardinals and the Rays models.

The second option in this week’s power poll at 25% of vote was “someone not currently on the roster,” suggesting that several IBI readers were like either a top closer free agent, or potentially a sleeper candidate at a low cost. It’s likely the Indians key focus right now as we head into the winter meetings.

The only other double-figure option is former top candidate Vinnie Pestano at 12%. Pestano was the closer-in-waiting in previous years, but struggled with health and velocity in 2013.

What might Terry Francona do?

In his first year of managing with the Phillies, Ricky Bottalico was already entrenched at the position in 1997. In 1998, when he got hurt, he turned to journeyman 35-year-old Mark Leiter, who was a starter prior to 1998. In 1999, Francona turned to Wayne Gomes, a player the Phillies had drafted with an electric fastball, and was projected as a closer from the start. He struggled, and in Francona’s final year in Philly, he would turn a 36-year old former closer trying to find his way, 36-year old Jeff Brantley.

You can see that in Philly, he used many different types of options, from an incumbent, to a journeyman starter, to a rookie stud, to a former closer trying to find his way.

Boston would hire Terry Francona on December 4, 2003 as their next manager. On January 7, 2004, Foulke signed with the Red Sox, that was reported on December 17th. It wasn’t a massive deal, even in 2004 standards, as Foulke took a $2 ½ million dollar paycut even after saving over 40 games for the A’s in 2003, but it was a deal ripe with incentives. Foulke was in a market that didn’t want to pay him a ton of money, so a team that was knocking on the World Series door was certainly enticing for Foulke. Foulke would appear in 11 of the 14 games in the postseason, including all four games of the World Series, and had a three-game span in the ALCS in which he threw 100 pitches over five innings. He was on the hill when the Sox won the series that year.

Francona loved him.

Foulke was struggling mightily with knee problems in 2005, and he ended up giving way to 39-year-old Mike Timlin, who was outstanding in the role, and relegated Foulke to the set-up man.

Enter Jonathan Papelbon in 2006, and the rest is history.

So what did Francona do in Boston?

On December 17th, two weeks after joining the Red Sox, they came to terms with a stud closer in Keith Foulke (it wouldn’t become official until January 7th). It was literally the first major move that Francona was a part of with the Sox.

When he struggled, he turned to a career reliever with some time spent as a closer in the past in Mike Timlin.

In 2006, Foulke was all set to be the closer, but when he struggled recovering from knee issues in 2005, he turned a potential stud starter in Jonathan Papelbon into a closer. It was believed that it was a temporary move, but Papelbon would never relinquish his role throughout the rest of Francona’s tenure.

Francona’s strategy is to use the most effective pitcher that he has at the back-end of games.

It’s really that simple.

He’s utilized every methodology since becoming a manager, meaning that it’s not likely he utilizes the Rays and Cardinals blueprint unless it is the best option available.

Consider the Indians options.

Might they go out and get themselves a potential stud closer via free agency, as Francona and the Red Sox did in 2004?

The Red Sox were patient in a market that was not conducive to closers receiving big money. Theo Epstein was then able to bring Foulke in at a decent, incentive-laden deal.

Can the Indians do that this year?

It’s a mystery with regard to how much money is available to the Indians, but with their payroll already reportedly in the low $80 million, they clearly don’t have a boatload of money available.

Who’s available?

The best closer available is Joe Nathan, and he’s reportedly in line to make anywhere from $10-million to $13 million a year. He’s 39-years old, so I can’t imagine that anyone would go in for him for more than two years. Would the Indians do that? I can’t fathom it, unless his deal comes way down. Would Francona sign him though to a one-year, sub-$10 million deal if he was available and the Indians were able to address other issues in a cost-effective way?

Based on his past, I’d say yes, and I think Chris Antonetti would be on board as well.

Will they?


Fernando Rodney and Brian Wilson are both available, and according to several sources, Chris Antonetti has talked to both.

Rodney was a cost-effective option for the Rays as mentioned previously, earning $2 ½ million last year for the Rays. He certainly will want more, and he certainly was a question mark for the Rays as the season came to the close. Still, I think the Indians will be interested at the right price. Speculation for Rodney is in the two-year, $7-10 million range.

Wilson rebounded nicely in a set-up role with the Dodgers last year, and is back in for a closer role this year. Rumors are rampant that he’s about to sign with the Tigers (I actually thought they already signed him), but I don’t think anything has been confirmed as of yet.

Wilson wants a multi-year deal, but if he can’t get the money he wants because he didn’t close, he may be able to grab a one-year deal, to the tune of $7-10 million.

Both would be enticing candidates for the Indians, and again, I think the Indians would be on board if they can work out their starting pitching issues and bench fill in other ways than free agency.

Will they sign these two?

Like Nathan, without their numbers dwinding, I don’t see it happening.

You can throw Grant Balfour in the mix as well, but like Nathan, Wilson and Rodney, will be looking or a multi-year deal in the $7-10 (or more) million dollar range.

Like the others, I think the Indians will be in the mix, but ultimately have to pass because of the money.

The unknown though?

There are rumors circulating that the cliff in which money may drop is fast approaching after the winter meetings, and with four guys all battling for the same type money, we could see a supply-demand issue, especially with a bunch of closers hitting free agency next year.

I still think those guys will get their money.

What about journeymen-esque relievers that the Indians could turn to?

Edward Mujica was a temporary fill-in for the Cardinals this year, and with a bevy of youngsters and the return of Motte, Mujica was let go without much of a push. He’s a former Tribe-hand, but thanks to his new mojo, will be looking for a multi-year deal. Rumors have him at that magical $7 million dollar range, but after really looking at the other options, I just don’t see it.

He’ll likely be in the real-life land of Joe Smith money, and while Smith is likely the better of the two, I’d say $5 million would be his ceiling. There is interest for sure from several other teams, but if he drops to $3 million a year, and in this market, I could see that, I wouldn’t hesitate at all to sign him to a two-year, $6 million deal.

That kind of money would allow Francona to use him as both a closer or set-up guy, if someone else presents themselves as a better option as spring or the season presents itself.

Joaquin Benoit is available, and he wasn’t horrible for the Tigers in 2013. He’s very similar in many ways to Mujica in that he’s been a reliever for several years, but never really a closer. He’s been around for a lot longer though, and he has more of a proven track record. Look for Benoit to have a ceiling of $7 million, and a floor of $5 million. Like Mujica, he could see that money come down a bit, especially considering Benoit’s age (36) heading into next year.

He’s another guy I’d be intrigued with for a nice one-year deal below $5 million.

Not likely, but an interesting market.

There are lots of other interesting names out there, starting with Jesse Crain, who is likely lined up in the same area money wise as Mujica and Benoit. Crain was unbelievable through July before a shoulder injury knocked him out of the season.

Crain throws a ton of strikes, is efficient, and was untouchable last year.

Of course, he didn’t make a pitch after July, making him an interesting watch money-wise.

The thing with Crain is fairly simple to me. Every site and every writer lists him as an Indians’ potential because he’s more or less a bit of a sleeper because of the injury.

I agree for the most part, but to think he’s a sleeper at this point, and to think that the Indians are the only team that will offer him good terms is fairly ridiculous. There are a BUNCH of teams that are going to call upon Crain’s agent, and while many think he’ll sign a one-year deal in the sub-$5 million realm, I don’t necessarily agree.

I could see a team that legitimately wants to roll the dice go after him with either a one-year, $5 million dollar deal, or go multi-years from $3-5 million a year, and lace it with incentives. He’s young enough and has been good enough that his salary could escalate.

Let me put it to you this way. If Mujica and Crain were both available, who would you choose? I’m sure that some would say Mujica because he’s a sure thing, but Crain has the better upside.

The Indians aren’t the only team that will note this.

Of course, there are mysteries based on that injury, but all reports are good, and Crain would present Francona with the ability to use him as a potential closer, or set-up guy, depending on who emerges.

There are several other interesting names out there that could be brought in as either a closer, or a solid back-end option, and it’s clear that the Indians will do that.

In house, I think you’ll see the Indians take a look at several candidates, including Allen, Pestano, Matt Capps andBryan Shaw. There are other guys, like Preston Guilmet, who has closed in the minors, but I don’t think he has the velocity to be a major league closer. There’s Austin Adams, who really is intriguing because of his velocity and K-Rate, but he still has a ways to go. There’s C.C. Lee, who will start the year in the pen, but maybe not as a closer, who really could be the sleeper here. There’s Bryan Price, who had a really nice season and many people are high on, although I see question marks.

Yes, there’s Carlos Carrasco, who has the ability, and certainly has the stuff. He saw a marked improvement once he was moved to the pen.

The other option not mentioned is a trade, but predicting that is nearly impossible, but I think, highly likely. I’ve said from that start that losing Cabrera at this point is a good thing, regardless of how he plays this year, and what he does in the future.

The option is there to deal him for a reliever, and if the right one is available, I could see the Indians pulling off that sorta deal. It COULD give the Indians several options as well, as their payroll would open up a bit on top of the player they receive.

Look for the Indians to be aggressive in the hunt for a closer, whether it’s via trade, signing or in-house, and it won’t likely end until someone is paid a lot to do it, or battles it out in spring training.

Both the Indians as an organization, and Terry Francona as a manager, will have one closer.

Who will it be?

It truly could be anyone. While that may stress the fans out, don’t let it. Francona has always had a decent success rate of finding a closer once it was a player he had a choice over.

Look for that trend to continue in 2014.

Check out for other Cleveland content from several IBI writers, including Browns, Cavaliers, Ohio State and some other off-the-cuff Indians' content, or stuff that was written prior to me joining IBI. I have a major piece I did in 2010 about the All-Aught Indians starting today, and will be posting daily for the next month!

Enjoy, and leave comments. It's not a site I intend to grow to the pantheons, just a place to have some fun. Call it your local watering hole of websites, where we can sit down, have a beer or two, and talk sports.

Jim is currently the senior editor and Columnist, as well as  the host of IBI's weekly online radio shows, Smoke Signals and Cleveland Sports Insiders. You can follow Jim on Twitter @Jim_IBI, or contact him via e-mail at

User Comments

December 2, 2013 - 10:15 AM EST
If Rodney is asking for more than $4-5M per then I stand corrected. Also, I just don't think Mujica is an option if he indeed is looking for a 3-year deal at $5M or so a year. I see a one year deal for someone. No long term commitment and limited salary. There should be a bevy of guys who fall through the cracks and fit that profile.....which leads me to believe that if the Indians don't trade for a backend reliever that they will sign one late in free agency once asking prices go down and players have limited options.

I still believe the Indians are going to clear salary, whether it be trading Cabrera or Bourn or others, which will allow them to add a starting pitcher and a backend reliever. There is still the possibility that payroll could end up between $85-90M too....we shall see. I definitely agree that a starting pitcher is the #1 need and that after that they need one proven backend arm, be it a setup man or closer.
December 2, 2013 - 9:23 AM EST

I hope your right...I wish I were as confident as you seem to be. But if he pitches better than last yr, I will take it. I'm concerned he could be dealing with another elbow injury, could be mechanics. Pestano just never seemed right last yr.
December 2, 2013 - 9:21 AM EST

I'd agree with that. They have to sign some SP in FA or acq. a young cost controlled SP. After seeing Hughes and Vargas get stupid deals, you'd think 2 yrs is reasonable for Kazmir. That would seem to fall in line with the Tribes philosophy in recent yrs. I get having hesitancy with Kazmir, but his performance and value makes him worth a risk short term risk.
December 1, 2013 - 11:27 PM EST

I believe Pestano will rebound 100%
December 1, 2013 - 10:16 PM EST
I was going to comment, but then I read Seth's comments. So, just go back and read his for a second time and consider my views expressed. If they blow $5-6M on a guy who's going to pitch 50-60 innings instead of $10M on a guy who would pitch 180-200, that's insanity and we deserve to lose.
December 1, 2013 - 9:46 PM EST
It seems to me that Vinnie Pestano is a huge wild card in the this whole mix. IF he comes back to pitching the way he has in the past, then the bullpen should actually be pretty good assuming they do add another arm or two to the mix.

I'm really not sure what to expect from the Tribe, it seems like they will be doing a lot of bargain shopping...unless they can free up some salary or acq, some young low cost ($$$) talent to fill needs.

On that note, there are rumors the Padres would consider moving Burch Smith for a LH bat / LHRP. Just saying...there are some Smith fans on this site.
December 1, 2013 - 9:16 PM EST
Believe me Seth, I get's move like the Twins that throw me into a frenzy because it can set a bad tone for teams like the Indians...

but the Twins...they used to do things the right way...but over the past five to seven years, they've really gone a different direction than their past...

The Hughes deal though...ugh...
December 1, 2013 - 9:04 PM EST
yeah, I guess my comment is more directed at Tony, who has said the Indians are unlikely to increase payroll yet has been itching for them to sign a vet reliever. I don't see how you reconcile those views, when the Indians have a clear need for a starting pitcher but a lot of in-house options to replace Joe Smith and Albers, the only relievers who were worthwhile last year and who won't be there next. If they have the money to sign a Kazmir or Colon and a "proven" reliever, go for it.

The Hughes signing is extremely perplexing. They must think they see something, but you'd think $24 million would be about 3 times what anyone else would offer Hughes, unless other teams are also seeing things. You can't even say the guy's been a "solid back of the rotation arm" or "innings eater" the past 3 years. And it's not like they're going to contend next year, so what was the rush to sign a reclamation project to a 3-year term? Best case he improve to be an actual back-of-rotation arm and you still finish 15 games out next year, worst-case, he continues pitching like he has and you're wasting $8 million when you might be legitimately contending a couple years from now and need that money to upgrade elsewhere. I'd much rather have Ubaldo and Kazmir than Nolasco and Hughes, and you'd think the cost would be about the same. Maybe less.

It's like the Twins saw the Royals sign Vargas, and wanted to match them. Except Vargas has been an actual innings-eating solid back-of-rotation arm, instead of a theoretical one.

Sorry for the rant. The Twins have boggled my mind.
December 1, 2013 - 8:40 PM EST

everything I hear about starters at this point is that for the most part, there's a logjam and that there's a believe that the top four or five guys are going to have to take a massive paycut.

A team like Minnesota obviously sees something in Hughes that others don't.

I, for one, don't think the Indians are going to pay 5 mill a year for any closer at any time...but wouldn't be upset at that either.

I am not under the conservative view that the Indians are going to hold at a pay ceiling.

I think if they need Kazmir, and he comes in at two years, then they'll make the move.

They are in a holding pattern.

I also know this front office enough to know that if they feel handcuffed, they'll move on, rather than wait and get nothing, as they have done in the past.

I truly believe they'll utilize an inhouse guy, and sign a couple of relievers in the 2-3 million range....or work out a trade or two.

We. Shall. See.

This Carlos Santana third base thing has me intrigued. I get a real sense that there's more to this than meets the eye.

I still believe it's going to be an exciting just all depends on what falls to them, or which players they attack.

It all about opportunity, and they'll have plenty...
December 1, 2013 - 8:31 PM EST
I just don't see how you can justify going after a Rodney and paying him even like $10 million over 2 years (seems low for a guy, would think he'd be in line for more per year) All I hear about is how they likely won't be able to retain Kazmir because he wants multiple years. I'd much rather have Kazmir at 2/20 than Rodney even at 2/10. If you have the money to afford a reliever like that, then there's no excuse not to double down and sign a starter. Until they have a starting pitcher in the bag, it's kind of useless to even ponder relievers who cost more than a couple million.

Just glad they didn't sign Phil Hughes for 3 years. And Nolasco for 4. Twins, wtf. If you're going to spend $73 million on pitching, you'd hope to get at least one pitcher with a history of being actually good.
December 1, 2013 - 7:21 PM EST
It was an alleged groin injury, that came out long after the Cardinals demoted him for Rosenthal. I'm not saying he's lying, but funny that the Cards never confirmed least to my knowledge.

Perhaps they did, I didn't really research it enough to know.
December 1, 2013 - 7:13 PM EST
I disagree with the sentiment that Mujica couldn't close for a contender. 37 saves last yr for the National League champs tells me he can IF needed. Btw, he lost the closers role in Sept bc he was dealing with shoulder soreness and tried to pitch through it. Veras, would be a fairly cheap insurance policy. Either way regardless of role, I'd like to see the Tribe add a veteran arm to help fortify the pen.
December 1, 2013 - 6:25 PM EST
Rodney's asking $8 or so million a year...we'll see how the market pans out. I figure $7-10 million, but it all depends on demand...
December 1, 2013 - 6:11 PM EST

Rodney might be asking for quite a bit more than 4-5M
December 1, 2013 - 5:46 PM EST
We do think alike

My wife actually thinks I use Shy as an alias...

My exact quote to her, "Jeez, you are really downgrading the real shy..."


I agree 100%

I think, if you watch the way he handled the pen last year, he'll go with someone that was already there, and someone he trusts...and it won't matter if it's the best member of the pen, or if its someone still rising.

So I have to believe Shaw and Allen are at the top of the list, with Pestano a close third.

I KNOW he like C.C. Lee as well...and even though my boy Hattery hates Guilmet, there are plenty in the system that likes him...not to be closer...but to fill a role.

I also think we'll see a starter filter into relieve...but a lot depends on what they do in the next month with their rotation, and via trade...
December 1, 2013 - 5:32 PM EST
I've seen enough of Mujica and Veras to know they will play down to their mean, which is not good enough to close on a contending team in a competitive division. Rodney has had electric stuff, but he is mercurial and mercurial works better in twenty somethings than in a guy almost 40, especially if you have to throw 98 to set up your breaking ball, Nathan,maybe, if character counts-and it does. Wilson is friggin'crazy- seriously, it's hard to predict how the team chemistry would be effected, too risky IMO. Crain, we all like his stuff. Have him in for a workout and a physical and if he passes write him a big check. Other than that, of all the names already on the roster and knocking on the door in the system, stay in-house and look for one or two to break through.
December 1, 2013 - 5:32 PM EST
I still want Carrasco to start. It's too bad he's out of options. Oh well. Just keep him on the squad.
December 1, 2013 - 3:36 PM EST
I agree with Tony the Tribe should save their best young arms (Allen and Shaw) for the 7th and 8th inning. A few names I'd like to see the Indians sign 1 or 2 of... Edward Mujica, Jesse Crain, and Jose Veras. Veras was the CL for the Astros last yr and should be an affordable vet on a short deal. Another cpl names to think about... John Axford (could be a non-tender candidate) and vet CL Kevin Gregg.
December 1, 2013 - 3:31 PM EST
Well, if you look at Francona's pens of the past, Foulke was their best reliever in 2004, by a good stretch, ahead of Timlin and Williamson, but Foulke was a free agent closer...period. In '05, Timlin was likely their best reliever all year, until Papelbon joined the pen. They kept Timlin as their closer though, interspersed with Foulke when he was healthy.

Papelbon joined the fray in 2006, and he was their best reliever that year, ahead of our boy, old man Tavarez and Timlin and Foulke and Breslow...

In 2007, it starts getting interesting, because that was the year that Okajima and Delcarmin entered the fray, and they were at least equivalent.

In 2008, there was a shift. Masterson was truly brilliant out of the pen, and I do wonder if Epstein wouldn't have ultimately made a move to give him more closing opps, and Okajima was likely their best member of the pen. Pap stayed the closer though. With Delcarmin and Javier Lopez though, and Pap may have been the third, or fourth best reliever that year.

In '09, the Red Sox relievers struggled more for sure...and Pap was likely back at the top, but by this point, he was the guy...period...and there were years, like 2010, when he may have been the fifth best reliever.

So the think is, if Francona finds his guy, he's his guy. He had it in Foulke until Foulke got hurt, and never officially gave it to anyone else until he had a prognosis on his knee, and a guy in Papelbon he liked to fill the roll. I wonder what woulda happened had Masterson had a big year in 2009. He was good, but not good enough to supplant Pap.

Should be interesting.

My gut, tells me Pestano, if his arm is sound...
December 1, 2013 - 3:12 PM EST
I'm all for a short term deal for a guy with proven experience and success as a closer. Rodney would fit well for the Indians since he probably won't command more than a two year deal and maybe not more than $4-5M a year. I kind of like keeping Allen in the 8th inning role since I am one of those people who believe your best reliever should be available to pitch the 7th and 8th inning and not just be limited to the 9th inning when they may never get in.

Your Name:
Leave a Comment:
Security Code: